The Hindu Editorial Vocabulary
Shopping for votes: on the
Interim Budget 2019-20
The interim budget
casts away established conventions and targets votes with sops
As election-eve
budgets go, Interim Budget 2019-20 must rank as one of the most politically expedient
ones this country has seen. The shadow of the general election falls squarely
on the budget proposals, which are aimed at seeking votes in the name of
various schemes that rain cash on beneficiaries. Whether the
strategy will work at the hustings remains to be seen. But there is no
denying that a lot of thought has gone into identifying and targeting the
sections of population across social segments that are in distress and unhappy
with the Centre for a variety of reasons. There is an income support scheme for
farmers who are reeling under the impact of falling realisations for
their crops, and a pension scheme for informal sector workers earning up to
₹15,000 a month. There are income tax concessions for the middle class
that have been carefully framed to target the lower rung. The ₹6,000 a
year income support to farmers will benefit 12 crore households, which is
almost half of the total number of households. Similarly, the increase in
standard deduction from ₹40,000 to ₹50,000 may be small but it will cover three
crore taxpayers, which is again almost half of the 6.8 crore taxpayers. The
income tax rebate on those with taxable annual income of up to ₹5 lakh a
year will benefit three crore middle class voters that includes traders, small
businesses, those who have just joined the formal workforce and pensioners.
While these sops will benefit
sections of the population, the question is whether it is correct for a
government that will be in power for less than two months in the next financial
year to write into the statute books proposals that are permanent. Though some
past governments have announced sops in their interim budgets with an eye on
elections, this budget has gone much further by announcing very significant
measures. In political terms, the strategy cannot be faulted as it appears to
have put the Opposition in a difficult spot — protesting too much about the
concessions given to those in distress may be counter-productive. That said,
some of these ideas may actually work in economic terms as they put money in
people’s hands. The housing-related tax proposals can give a leg-up to the real
estate sector, which is a job-creator and is now in trouble. The sops come with
a cost, though. The Centre will miss the glide-path for reducing the fiscal
deficit, yet again. The estimated slippage of 0.10 percentage point is not
significant if we assume that the concessions will spur spending by the
beneficiaries. This is, of course, assuming that the gross tax revenue
projection of ₹25.52 lakh crore, which is a 13.5% growth over the revised
estimates of 2018-19, is achieved. But this arithmetic will be the headache of
the next government.
Vocabulary --
§ Cast away – (फेंक देना) to
discard, dispose of
§
Conventions
– (परिपाटी) a way in which something is usually
done,
§
Expedient
– (उपाय,लाभकारक) convenient, appropriate
§
Beneficiaries
– (लाभार्थियों) a person who drives advantage from something
§ Hustings – (चुनाव) a meeting at
which candidates in an election address
potential voters.
§
Reeling
– (लच्छा बनना, घिरना) coil
§
Fiscal
deficit – (राजकोषीय
घाटा) government revenue reduction.
§ Spur – (प्रेरणा ) stimulus,
encouragement
§ Squarely – directly (without deviating
to one side)
§
Seeking
– (मांगना) ask, demand
§
Whether
– (या, दोनों में से कोन सा ) choice between
alternatives.
§
Distress
– (संकट) hazard, difficulty
§
Concessions
– (छूट) discount
§
Rung
– (सीडी का डंडा) rod of ladder
§
Statute
– (कानून) provision
§
Counter-productive
– अनुत्पादक
§
Sops
– रियायतों
§ Glide-path – (उड़ान पथ) a series
of events or actions leading smoothly to a particular outcome.
§
Slippage
– (फिसलना)
§
Rebate - (छूट) discount
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------